在考研英语中，想要拿下考研英语高分势必是有些吃力的，听书读写中阅读能力尤为重要，阅读是听说写的基础，没有精读、泛读的大量积累输入，其他能力是无法得到本质上的突破，所以需要大量的真题以及外刊来辅助提升，今天新航道好轻松考研小编准备了历年考研英语外刊常考热点：知识产权保护，希望对大家有帮助。

　　原文标题：

　　Supreme Court Could Take Intellectual Property Protections Back 50 Years

　　知识产权保护，一般是指人类智力劳动产生的智力劳动成果所有权。它是依照各国法律赋予符合条件的著作者、发明者或成果拥有者在一定期限内享有的独占权利，一般认为它包括版权（著作权）和工业产权。版权（著作权）是指创作文学、艺术和科学作品的作者及其他著作权人依法对其作品所享有的人身权利和财产权利的总称；工业产权则是指包括发明专利、实用新型专利、外观设计专利、商标、服务标记、厂商名称、货源名称或原产地名称等在内的权利人享有的独占性权利。

　　脉络:

　　直述事件及其意义（第 一段）→介绍本案背景（第二段）→谷歌对其抄袭行为的辩护及作者的反驳（第三、四段）→阐明此案的重大影响（第五、六段）→重申影响，发出呼吁，希望法院意识到谷歌胜诉的危害性（第七段）

　　Part 1 原文

　　Ⅰ  On October 7, the Justices will hear oral arguments in the Google v. Oracle case, which many lawyers have referred to as the copyright case of the century. It will mark the first time the High Court rules on the copyrightability of software since Congress passed the Copyright Act of 1976-the law that governs the country’s entire copyright system. As such, it will set a crucial precedent for the future of copyright law and the United States’ economy in the digital age .

　　Ⅱ   Google v. Oracle was initially filed nearly a decade ago after Google inquired about licensing portions of Oracle’s popular computer platform, Java, but elected to copy it instead. It then used the replicated code to build software for its mobile operating system, Android.

　　Ⅲ   Google argues that the computer coding it copied is not entitled to the protections of the Copyright Act. However, in the first comprehensive congressional review of copyright law since the 1970s, it became evident that the Copyright Act clearly extends copyright protection to all “original works of authorship.” The bill’s report even explicitly singles out computer programs as a new form of expression that was “considered copyrightable from the outset without the need of new legislation.”

　　Ⅳ  Google has also attempted to claim an exemption to copyright under the “fair use” principle, which allows limited use that does not replace the original work. However, Google’s interpretation of fair use is grossly out of step with the purpose of the principle. Its verbatim reproduction of Java’s code for an entirely commercial purpose was not transformative. It simply copied material for use in Google’s platform to do the same thing that it does in Oracle’s platform. That is very different from actions that the Copyright Act accepts as fair use, such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching and research.

　　Ⅴ  The substantial success of the internet, and the subsequent explosion of technological advances, are directly attributable to strong IP rights. As technology has advanced over time, IP law has developed to reflect those changes-creating an atmosphere of certainty that has facilitated its continued growth and success.

　　VI   As is evident from the wide variety of amicus briefs filed against Google, a ruling in Google’s favor would have significant negative implications for not only the software industry, but also for musicians, news publishers, health care professionals and the U.S. economy. Even Justice Department officials in both the Obama and Trump administrations filed amicus briefs in three separate instances positioning the federal government against Google’s unlicensed use of Java. They both understood that ruling in this manner would undermine the efficacy of the nation’s intellectual property laws.

　　VII   The United States cannot afford to change its laws to accommodate one tech giant at the expense of innovation and economic growth in the digital age. Here’s hoping the Supreme Court recognizes what is at stake and stands up for the future of technological innovation.

　　Part 2长难句语法点拨

　　本句主句是the Justices will hear oral arguments in the Google v. Oracle case,大法官将听取谷歌诉甲骨文一案的口头辩论，后接which引导的非限制性定语从句修饰“谷歌诉甲骨文案”，先行词还原到从句中放到refer to 后面。“这一案件被许多律师称为版权的世纪之案。”

　　Part 3写作句型借鉴

　　As such, it will set a crucial precedent for …….因此，它将为……树立一个重要的先例。

　　原文例句：As such, it will set a crucial precedent for the future of copyright law and the United States’ economy in the digital age .因此，它将为未来的版权法和数字时代的美国经济树立一个至关重要的先例。

　　XX is not entitled to the protections of YY. XX 不受YY的保护

　　原文例句：Google argues that the computer coding it copied is not entitled to the protections of the Copyright Act. 谷歌争辩说，它复制的计算机编码不受《版权法》的保护。因此，它将为未来的版权法和数字时代的美国经济树立一个至关重要的先例。

　　As is evident from the wide variety of briefs filed against XX，YY would have significant negative implications for not only AA, but also BB.从各种各样反对XX的陈述中可以看出，YY 不仅会对AA 产生负面影响，而且会对BB 产生负面影响

　　原文例句：As is evident from the wide variety of amicus briefs filed against Google, a ruling in Google’s favor would have significant negative implications for not only the software industry, but also for musicians, news publishers, health care professionals and the U.S. economy. 从各种各样反对谷歌的法庭之友的陈述中可以明显看出，对谷歌有利的裁决不仅会对软件业产生重大的负面影响，而且会对音乐家、新闻出版商、医疗保健专业人员和美国经济产生重大的负面影响。

　　今天新航道好轻松考研小编整理的历年考研英语外刊常考热点：知识产权保护就到这里了，希望大家能在题目与答案中找到解题思路。