0731-88549888

2021年托福独立写作真题范文:艺术家该不该被资助

作者: 2021-04-06 16:13 来源:长沙编辑
收藏

  托福写作可能是中国考生较为不擅长的科目了,很多同学虽然能在阅读听力上拿到高分,但写作上却常常只能获得拖后腿的成绩。那么托福写作如何获取高分呢?当然少不了日常的练习,下面新航道托福培训小编给大家整理2021年托福独立写作真题范文:艺术家该不该被资助,希望对大家有帮助。


  


  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?


  Government should not provide financial support to artists (For example, painters, writer, musicians …), and the government should let them support themselves.


  ”


  A vast majority of people advocate that the artists should be subsidized by the government because they celebrate the individual artists as both creator of beauty and catalyst for the community development. However, in my opinion, fiscal support for the artists may be counterproductive in many aspects and government had better not provide this support.


  ▲ Subsidize vt. 资助


  Subsidy n. 补贴


  ▲ Catalyst for sth. 某事的刺激因素


  Firstly, government funding of artists is inequitable for the taxpayers. To specify, now that artistic creations are not basic necessity of life, it is unfair that every taxpayer, the major benefactor of such funding, need to contribute towards such creations that they seldom engage with. Admittedly, every individual enjoys some forms of art, be it through movies, music or books. However, such forms of art are highly lucrative. With considerable revenue gained from the tickets fees and relevant industries, filmmakers, actors, singers and composers are more than capable to support themselves, and the government funding for them is thus undoubtedly redundant. In this case, if those artists are still subsidized by the government, complaints from the masses may be the necessary result. As for the artists whose creations are highbrow or caviar to the general, the rich or the art aficionado should fund them out of their own pocket instead of seeking funding from the government.


  ▲ 尽管电影等艺术形式是民众平常都能接触到的,但这都是高利润产业,其从业者无需被资助;而那些阳春白雪的艺术作品应该有真正喜爱它的人而不是被政府资助


  Furthermore, while the artists are expected to be motivated by the financial support, they are more likely to become excessively reliant on it, which is certainly undesirable. In other words, when they are aware that no matter whether their works can sell well, their livelihood is still ensured by the government’s subsidy, hardly can they be forceful enough honing their creations. In this case, how can we expect any more masterpieces? On the contrary, without the government funding, artists may be more meticulous in creating, most likely because they would otherwise find it hard to earn their bread from those creations. Hence, for the advent of elaborate pieces of art, the artists should not be funded by the government.


  ▲ Earn one’s bread 谋取生计


  ▲ Hone vt. 磨练,雕琢


  ▲ Meticulous adj. 细心的


  To sum up, considering the potential complaints from the taxpayers and negative effects brought by the over reliance, artists are better to support themselves than to be subsidized by the government.


  ▲ 总结段,概括分论点,重新点明立场即可

  • 品牌简介
  • 优势对比
  • 线上微课
  • 境外考团
  • 免费代报名
  • 校区地图
热门活动

注册/登录

+86
获取验证码

登录

+86

收不到验证码?

知道了

找回密码

+86
获取验证码
下一步

重新设置密码

为您的账号设置一个新密码

保存新密码

密码重置成功

请妥善保存您的密码
立即登录

为了确保您的帐号安全

请勿将帐号信息提供给他人/机构